How I Landed on These 3 College Football Bets
I mentioned these three picks in today’s VSiN Daily, but here’s the deeper dive into how I got there.
I went through Steve Makinen’s Week 4 college football Analytics Report and weighed the systems, power ratings, team trends and latest DraftKings betting splits behind each play.

One of the three actually changed after I looked at the latest splits.
Here’s the case for each.
Illinois +27.5 at Ohio State
This was probably the cleanest college football case.
Illinois shows up near the top of two different Steve Makinen ratings systems.
His Power Ratings have Illinois as the No. 3 underpriced underdog, showing 4.6 points of value.
His Bettors Ratings have the Illini No. 2, with 6.1 points of value.
There’s also a strong Illinois team trend: the Illini are 19-9 ATS in road or neutral games since 2021.
Then there’s one of Steve’s ranked-team systems.
Ranked home conference favorites of more than 14 points against unranked opponents are just 168-211-4 ATS, or 44.3%, and Ohio State -27.5 qualifies as a fade.
The DraftKings market is heavily tilted toward Ohio State: 78% of the spread handle and 80% of the bets are on the Buckeyes.
There are contradictory signals. One of Steve’s betting-split systems actually likes huge home favorites such as Ohio State. So this isn’t a case where everything agrees.
But I liked having two separate ratings models, the Illinois road trend and the ranked-favorite fade all pointing toward the same side.
The pick: Illinois +27.5
Wyoming +3 vs. Hawaii
This one kept getting better the more I dug.
Steve has Hawaii at just 15-27 ATS as a favorite, while Wyoming is 16-5 ATS in its last 21 home conference games as an underdog.
There’s another Hawaii-specific trend: the Rainbow Warriors are just 4-18 ATS in their last 22 conference games as a single-digit favorite.
The series history also likes the home team. Home teams are 7-1 ATS in the last eight Hawaii-Wyoming meetings.
And this isn’t just a collection of historical trends.
Steve’s Bettors Ratings make Wyoming the No. 4 underpriced underdog this week, showing 5.4 points of value.
Meanwhile, the latest DraftKings market has 77% of the spread handle and 74% of the bets on Hawaii -3.
So we’ve got several pieces of Steve’s data pointing toward the home dog while the market is heavily backing the road favorite.
That was enough for me.
The pick: Wyoming +3
Boston College +14 vs. Virginia Tech
This is the one that changed.
I originally had James Madison-Old Dominion Over 44.5 as my third play.
Then I looked at the updated betting splits and went back through the BC-Virginia Tech numbers.
Steve’s Effective Yards Per Play calculation produces one of the biggest discrepancies anywhere in the report.
The actual line in his report was Virginia Tech -14.
His Effective YPP line was Boston College -0.3.
That’s a 14.3-point difference toward BC.
There are also some supporting team trends.
Virginia Tech is 10-24 ATS after a straight-up win, while Boston College is 29-18 ATS in conference games since 2020.
And home teams are 7-2 ATS in the last nine Virginia Tech-Boston College meetings.
Then I looked at DraftKings:
87% of the spread handle and 81% of the bets are on Virginia Tech -14.
That lines up with two of Steve’s betting-split fade systems: one fading sides attracting very heavy handle and another fading majority-backed road favorites.
There is a big contradiction here that I don’t want to hide.
Steve’s Bettors Ratings actually favor Virginia Tech -14 by 5.8 points.
So this isn’t unanimous at all.
But that huge Effective YPP discrepancy, the BC trends and the lopsided betting market were enough for me to switch.
The pick: Boston College +14
So that’s the college football card:
Illinois +27.5 at Ohio State
Wyoming +3 vs. Hawaii
Boston College +14 vs. Virginia Tech
And yes, I changed one after looking at the updated market.
That’s really the point of this exercise. Steve’s report gives us a ton of information. The handicapping comes from deciding which pieces deserve the most weight.
These are my picks using Steve’s data, not Steve’s official Best Bets.
What did I miss? Post the bet you think has the strongest case from Steve’s report — and tell me why. If there’s a good one, I may feature it in VSiN Daily.


